是 让
这属于 8.9.3 的情况,即没有实际接触,前锋因害怕击中对手而暂停挥杆,则适用 8.6 的规定。黄衣队员保持了一段时间,当黑衣队员阻止挥杆时,前锋已经对能打哪一球产生了怀疑。因此,挥杆受到了对手的影响,而对手正竭尽全力避免干扰,因此允许让球。
中风
绿衣球员打出一记高球,一直回到球场中央。白衣球员打出一记高弹球,并保持住位置,这意味着对手没有进入的机会。绿衣球员的线路穿过对手,他本可以打出一记漂亮的回球。
是 让
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference a let is allowed
中风
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
没有让
既没有干扰,也没有合理的伤害恐惧,不允许让球。
中风
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
是 让
前锋在转身时遇到干扰,本可以很好地回击。非前锋没有时间避开干扰,因此允许让球。桃色方球员转身时不确定对手的位置,如果前锋试图击球,会有安全风险。
中风
如果挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,则判击球方得一杆,即使对手已尽力避免干扰。
中风
桃色球手打出一记松球,灰色球手准备击球,但没有跨场选择。击球是正确的决定。
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference a let is allowed
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference, so a yes let is allowed.
当时存在干扰,前锋本可以很好地回传。对手正在尽力解围,让球是允许的。当前锋可以击球时,就有了比赛空间。对手保持位置,不挡道。前锋的挥拍不足以阻止挥拍。让球是正确的决定。
蓝衣球员打出一球,但她没有很好地解围,粉衣球员本来可以很好地回击,但也稍微向对手移动了一下。因此,让球是正确的决定。
There was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return, a let is allowed.This is a let for safety but the player in black could have hit the ball at a professional level. In the amateur game, this is more likely to be a stroke.
挥杆受到与对手轻微接触的影响,而对手正竭尽全力避免干扰;允许让球。桃色球手不太确定对手的位置,在准备过程中轻微接触。在这种情况下,击球太容易了。
射门直奔死角,接触面积极小。球员需要去拿球。干扰是有的,但这并不妨碍前锋看到球,也不妨碍他回传,这是最小的干扰,不允许让球。
There was interference, but it did not prevent the striker from seeing and getting to the ball to make a good return, this is minimal interference and no let is allowed.Although there was interference, in this situation, the referee wants to see the player really look to get through and play the ball.
在这个级别的职业比赛中,球员需要完成击球。在初学者或俱乐部级别,你会希望他们停下来请求让球。
There was interference but the striker did not make every effort to get to and play the ball, no let is allowed.The player in black has some space to go and hit the ball, he must go through to play this.
从正面角度看,黑衣球员没有及时做好击球准备。
既没有干扰,也没有受伤的合理担忧,就不允许让球。在俱乐部比赛中,根据水平不同,可能更多的是为了安全而让球。
The swing was prevented by contact with the opponent, so a stroke is awarded to the striker, even if the opponent was making every effort to avoid the interference.
如果存在干扰,球会直接击中非前锋的前墙,则判前锋击球。
红色球手快速横击,球飞向中路。黑色球手打出一记进攻性的发球,但球落在短线前方,你必须考虑击球点的位置。黑衣球员的基础很宽,没有让对手通过。击球是正确的决定,因为黑衣球员让对手很难通过。前锋本来可以打出很好的回球,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,因此判前锋击球。
挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,即使对手竭力避免干扰,也应判击球方得一杆
There has been no actual contact and the swing has been held by the striker for fear of hitting the opponent, the provisions of 8.6 apply, and, the striker would have been able to make a good return but the opponentwas not able to avoid the interference, so a stroke is awarded to the striker.Even though every effort was being made by the player in yellow, there was no chance for the player in black to hit the ball.
挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,即使对手竭力避免干扰,也应判击球方得一杆
黑衣球员射门得手。
前锋本可直接出球,但却选择了间接出球,然后请求干扰让球,不允许让球。最初的一步很重要,白衣球员向对手迈出了第一步。没有让球是一个很好的强有力的决定,并给出了很好的解释。
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
前锋本可直接触球,但却选择了间接触球的路径,然后要求因干扰而让球,这是不允许的。
前锋本可直接触球,但却选择了间接触球。来球的前锋最初的移动距离球场太远,从而造成了干扰。不允许进球是正确的判罚。
对方球员竭力回避干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。双方球员都略显拼抢,因此让球是一个公平的决定。
如果前锋因过度挥杆而造成干扰,则不允许让球。蓝衣前锋的挥拍动作夸张。观察肩膀以及肩膀如何转动是一个很好的线索。
有干扰,球会直接打在非前锋的前墙上,判前锋击球。
没有实际接触,前锋因害怕击中对手而没有挥杆,适用 8.6 条款,而且对手正在尽力避免干扰,前锋本可以很好地回击,允许让球。是的,让球是正确的决定
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
挥杆时与对手的轻微接触影响了挥杆,而对手正竭力避免让杆的干扰。
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
对手竭力回避干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
如果挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,则判击球方得一杆,即使对手已尽力避免干扰。
如果存在干扰,球会直接击中非前锋的前墙,则判前锋击球。
白方棋手将球打到了后角,他可以做得更多,以更好地清理。黑方棋手可以做得更多,以向上移动并绕过对方,但他向白方棋手移动,并用手臂挡住了对方。
挥杆时与对手的轻微接触影响了击球,而对手正竭力避免让球的干扰。安全让球的后续动作,球很高,当蓝衣球员击球时,对手已经安全了。
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference, so a let is allowed.There is enough contact in the backswing to throw off the striker on the way to the ball.
虽然有干扰,但前锋不可能做出很好的回传,因此可以不判点球。
挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,即使对手竭力避免干扰,也应判击球方得一杆
虽然有干扰,但这并不妨碍前锋看清球,也不妨碍前锋回传,这是最小的干扰,不允许让球。
There was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return, a let is allowed.The striker should be told to make more effort to go directly to the ball.
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
There was neither interference nor reasonable fear of injury, no let isallowed.The player in yellow was not ready to play the shot.
黄衣球员打出了一记制胜球,尽管有一些干扰,但前锋不可能打出很好的回击;不让球是正确的决定。
There was contact as the player in yellow was about to play the shot. There was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return; a let is the correct decision.
有干扰,但前锋不可能很好地回传,不允许让球
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
有干扰,而对手正在竭力回避,前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。是的,让球是正确的决定。
黑衣球员击出的落点接住了侧壁。灰衣球员向球移动,但她下一击的通道和位置受到了对手的阻挠。击球是正确的决定。前锋本可以打出一个很好的回球,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,因此判前锋击球。
The swing was prevented by contact with the opponent, a stroke is awarded to the striker, even if the opponent was making every effort to avoid the interference.The player in pink hits a crosscourt lob that comes out towards the middle. The player in blue attempts to strike the ball but makes heavy contact with the opponent. Although the swing was not prevented, the trajectory and result of the shot was completely altered due to the contact of the swing. Therefore a stroke is the correct decision.
虽然有干扰,但黑衣棋手不可能很好地回击,不允许让球。
对方球员竭尽全力避开干扰,前锋本可以做出很好的回击,允许让球。穿粉色球衣的球员通过与臀部的接触遇到了足够的干扰,本可以做出很好的回击。是的,让球是正确的决定。
虽然有干扰,但前锋不可能做出很好的回传,因此不允许让球。在呼吁让球时,蓝衣球员距离球很远。
蓝衣球员持球时间较长,球第二次反弹是在两名球员面前。为了击球,蓝衣球员需要向前迈出一步,这意味着干扰较少,因此可以做出让球的决定。
接收最新消息

订阅我们的时事通讯

获取新文章通知