是 让
前锋在转身时遇到干扰,本可以很好地回击。非前锋没有时间避开干扰,因此允许让球。桃色方球员转身时不确定对手的位置,如果前锋试图击球,会有安全风险。
是 让
穿灰色球衣的球员只是让出了足够的空间,让人有足够的理由怀疑横传是否会击中他,从而不适用规则 8.11.1。因此,为了安全起见,让球是正确的决定。
没有让
前锋本可直接触球,但却选择了间接触球,然后要求因干扰而让球;不让球是正确的判罚。
是 让
对手正在尽力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。蓝衣球员本可以做出很好的回击,但不确定是否有可能打出交叉球,也不确定交叉球是否会击中对手。因此,在这种情况下判罚让球。
没有让
The striker had direct access but instead took an indirect path to the ball and then requested a let for interference, no let is allowed. The player in black moved to the side to provide a line to the ball. No Let is the correct decision.
中风
前锋本来可以很好地回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,判前锋击球。
中风
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
是 让
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference, so a let is allowed.There is enough contact in the backswing to throw off the striker on the way to the ball.
是 让
对方球员竭尽全力避开干扰,前锋本可以做出很好的回击,允许让球。穿粉色球衣的球员通过与臀部的接触遇到了足够的干扰,本可以做出很好的回击。是的,让球是正确的决定。
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
非前锋球员没有时间避开干扰,允许让球。蓝衣球员允许球绕墙滚动并在请求让球前转身,如果多次这样做,不让球是正确的。这次则是让球。
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference a let is allowed
挥杆时与对手的轻微接触影响了挥杆,而对手正竭力避免让杆的干扰。
对方球员竭力回避干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。双方球员都略显拼抢,因此让球是一个公平的决定。
There was interference, but it did not prevent the striker from seeing and getting to the ball to make a good return, this is minimal interference and no let is allowed.There is almost no interference and a line behind the opponent to the ball.
有干扰,但前锋不可能很好地回传,不允许让球
从正面角度看,黑衣球员没有及时做好击球准备。
There was interference but the striker did not make every effort to get to and play the ball, no let is allowed.The was interference but the player in blue doesn’t move anywhere and there is distance to the shot. No let is the correct call.
如果前锋因过度挥杆而造成干扰,则不允许让球。蓝衣前锋的挥拍动作夸张。观察肩膀以及肩膀如何转动是一个很好的线索。
既没有干扰,也没有合理的伤害恐惧,不允许让球。
The swing was prevented by contact with the opponent, so a stroke is awarded to the striker, even if the opponent was making every effort to avoid the interference.
The player in black hits a kill that pops out from the side wall and comes back towards the service box. There is no access for the player in yellow. The striker would have been able to make a good return but the opponent was not making every effort to avoid the interference; a stroke is to the striker is the correct decision.
前锋本可以打出漂亮的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,因此判前锋击球。
如果挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,则判击球方得一杆,即使对手已尽力避免干扰。
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
黑衣球员击出的落点接住了侧壁。灰衣球员向球移动,但她下一击的通道和位置受到了对手的阻挠。击球是正确的决定。前锋本可以打出一个很好的回球,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,因此判前锋击球。
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
前锋本可直接出球,但却选择了间接出球,然后请求干扰让球,不允许让球。最初的一步很重要,白衣球员向对手迈出了第一步。没有让球是一个很好的强有力的决定,并给出了很好的解释。
The first step of the player in blue was up the court and the drop went deeper which meant the player was out of position to get the shot. The striker had direct access but instead took an indirect path to the ball and then requested a let for interference, no let is allowed
前锋本可打出漂亮的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
The player in yellow was off balance from the previous shot and went for the opponent more than going to play the ball.Because the striker had direct access but instead took an indirect path to the ball and then requested a let for interference, no let is allowed.
黄衣球员打出了一记制胜球,尽管有一些干扰,但前锋不可能打出很好的回击;不让球是正确的决定。
The swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference, so a yes let is allowed.
There was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return, a let is allowed. The player in blue attempts to stay out of the way for as long as possible, especially as the ball comes round a long way. By the time the striker wants to play the ball, the cross court is a very difficult shot, so yes let is the correct decision.
如果存在干扰,球会直接击中非前锋的前墙,则判前锋击球。
挥杆时与对手的轻微接触影响了击球,而对手正竭尽全力避免让杆的干扰。
如果存在干扰,球会直接击中非前锋的前墙,则判前锋击球。
挥杆受到与对手轻微接触的影响,而对手正在尽力避免干扰,允许让球。对手挡住了球,但球正在远离双方球员。有足够的干扰,可以判罚让球。
白方棋手将球打到了后角,他可以做得更多,以更好地清理。黑方棋手可以做得更多,以向上移动并绕过对方,但他向白方棋手移动,并用手臂挡住了对方。
球是松散的,但球员和球之间也有空间。
虽然有干扰,但这并不妨碍前锋看到球,也不妨碍他回球,这只是最小的干扰,不允许让球。
射门直奔死角,接触面积极小。球员需要去拿球。干扰是有的,但这并不妨碍前锋看到球,也不妨碍他回传,这是最小的干扰,不允许让球。
挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,即使对手竭力避免干扰,也应判击球方得一杆
There has been no actual contact and the swing has been held by the striker for fear of hitting the opponent, the provisions of 8.6 apply. So, the striker would have been able to make a good return but the opponent was not making every effort to avoid the interference, a stroke is awarded to the striker.
挥杆因与对手接触而受阻,即使对手竭力避免干扰,也应判击球方得一杆
前锋本来可以打出很好的回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰,则判前锋击球。
白衣球员击出一记发球,球击中边墙后向球场中央飞去。黑衣球员正准备反手击球,不得不换到正手侧才能击球。球飞离黑衣球员,而黑衣球员不在击球位置上。
桃色球手打出一记松球,灰色球手准备击球,但没有跨场选择。击球是正确的决定。
穿黄色球衣的球员打出一记排球,但由于落点问题,他无法解围。前锋本来可以很好地回击,但对手没有尽力避开干扰;判前锋击球是正确的决定。
There was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return; a let is the correct decision..
在这个级别的职业比赛中,球员需要完成击球。在初学者或俱乐部级别,你会希望他们停下来请求让球。
对手正在竭力避免干扰,而前锋本可以做出很好的回击,因此允许让球。
当时存在干扰,前锋本可以很好地回传。对手正在尽力解围,让球是允许的。当前锋可以击球时,就有了比赛空间。对手保持位置,不挡道。前锋的挥拍不足以阻止挥拍。让球是正确的决定。
There was interference but the striker would not have been able to make a good return, no let is allowed.The player in black was not ready in time to be able to hit the ball.
There was neither interference nor reasonable fear of injury, no let isallowed.The player in yellow was not ready to play the shot.
There was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return, a let is allowed.This is a let for safety but the player in black could have hit the ball at a professional level. In the amateur game, this is more likely to be a stroke.
前锋本可直接触球,但却选择了间接触球。来球的前锋最初的移动距离球场太远,从而造成了干扰。不允许进球是正确的判罚。
这是一个很接近的判罚,因为穿桃色衣服的球员在边线上停留的时间比他应该停留的时间要长一些,但穿灰色衣服的球员并没有走向球。不让球是正确的决定。
虽然有干扰,但前锋不可能做出很好的回传,因此不允许让球。在呼吁让球时,蓝衣球员距离球很远。
蓝衣球员持球时间较长,球第二次反弹是在两名球员面前。为了击球,蓝衣球员需要向前迈出一步,这意味着干扰较少,因此可以做出让球的决定。
没有实际接触,前锋因害怕击中对方而没有挥拍,适用 8.6 条款。有干扰,而对方正在竭力避免,前锋本可以做出很好的回击,允许让球。当穿深红色球衣的球员准备击球时,球稍稍落后于他,有空间直接击球,而穿深红色球衣的球员必须轻击球才能过场。弹击过场球不会击中对手。因此,让球是正确的决定。
绿衣球员打出一记高球,一直回到球场中央。白衣球员打出一记高弹球,并保持住位置,这意味着对手没有进入的机会。绿衣球员的线路穿过对手,他本可以打出一记漂亮的回球。
接收最新消息

订阅我们的时事通讯

获取新文章通知